What kind of criteria should we (humanity) develop to distinguish our potential Allies from our potential adversaries?

Why do we even need such criteria? Because we live in a physical environment in the Greater Community, and we do have adversaries.

For us, as students of Knowledge, it’s very clear that any extraterrestrials here are part of the Intervention. But this might not be the case at some point in the future. It’s a changing situation.

It’s very important that we be aware of what any visitors are asking of us, and what hidden benefits this might bring to them. We need to discern their underlying motives.

Anyone offering us what we want while also playing on our fears should arouse suspicion and skepticism. Anyone offering salvation or happy visions of the future should be viewed as suspect.

Any information they give us should be verifiable. (A characteristic of much ET-channeled material is that it is completely unverifiable by human means--such as whether a particular race are really Pleiadians--and requires acceptance on faith alone.)

Ultimately, we will need to be able to rely upon Knowledge to discern Allies from adversaries. In the meantime, in the absence of Knowledge, we have only three basic tools we can utilize to help verify whether particular ETs are friend or foe: our common sense, our observation of nature, and lessons from human history.

Perhaps one of the characteristics of true Allies is that they will allow us the time and space to actually know whether they are Allies.

From Tim in Pennsylvania:

A criteria I recommend we use is time. Time to research, time to use the innate power of knowledg, etc. Anyone denying us the gift should be looked at in the same manner as a used car salesman or snake oil peddler.

From Spencer in Michigan:

Without Knowledge, it would be difficult to discern if the Short Grays, Tall Grays, Indigenous Reptalians, Draconian Reptilians, Syrians from Sirius B, or the Anunnaki from Nibiru are cooperating within the military industrial extraterrestrial complex or if the Telosians, Lyrians, Vegans, Pleiadians, Procyons, Taucetians, Andromedans, Syrians from Sirius A, Ummites, Alfacentaurians OR the Acturians might ascribe to a higher purpose.

From Sergio in Brazil:

Imagine we human beings dealing with aliens with a much higher IQ than us, knowing deeply our weeknesses and how to try to best manipulate us to their only interests.

All caution will be surely unsufficient in order to protect us from any misjudgments on the true nature of ETs. As you say so wisely, as the Knowledge will be progressively awaken within us, it'll be very easy and natural. But until we'll reach that consciousness level, we'd try to be extremely cautious,and in case of doubt always judge some kind of unknown ETs as potentially dangerous to us.

From Gerald in Venezuela:

I think with all that is happenning in our world, is very difficult to actually know anything I mean we as humans remains ignorants about lots of things, including the fact the we don't even know ourself, so I think in many aspects we know what other person or nation or other world want us to know, so to the questions about if the allies are really our allies, I do know that knowledge in every one of us is the key to actually knowing and feeling that they are really our allies, not the ones the take people at night without permission and that hide in the back of our goverments. It is difficult grasp the truth, there are people that could said the intervention is really our allies because they are here to help us bring peace to the world and make us more spiritual, you know the same kind of thing that happen in this continent when the spanish empire came to the new world and promise all those things to the natives and the spanish were treated like God, only to find out the spanish were mortal and it was too late, Marshall is right we are the natives once again. Thanks to our allies to remind us not to repeat history again.

From Spencer in Michigan:

Those extraterrestrial visitors who have been potentially beneficial to humanity have all retreated from the world in the face of the Intervention. Those remaining are alien races who are not here for our benefit. This leaves us in an unambiguos situation regarding the extraterestrial presence. This enables us to clearly see what we are dealing with. Otherwise, it would be impossible for us to tell friend from foe.

From Lonnie in South Carolina:

It has been suggested in the past that humanity needs to establish rules of engagement for extraterrestrial contact. Once we have those rules in place, the easiest and most readily applied criterion is whether or not a particular group of ETIs is willing to abide by our prescribed rules of engagement. True allies, true friends will not object to this stipulation.

From Helene in Georgia:

I have read the Declaration of Human Sovereignty [link is at the alliesofhumanity.org home page] and find it to be extremely relevant to this month's discussion. It speaks to all the criteria we must consider in dealing with any races from beyond. I recommend it highly.

Final Thoughts from the Following Meeting

Good criteria for discerning whether Visitors are friend or foe are provided in the Declaration of Human Sovereignty .

Some people will be skeptical of such criteria because extraterrestrials are not human, and are therefore somehow more forgivable than humans. This is indicative of the depth of human denial. It's useful to remember that "the universe is not limited by human understanding."

For now, we can take the following position as a starting point: "If you're here as an ET, in secret, or in secret relationship with human beings, you're 'on the list.'"

Beware of trading human freedom for "technological wampum."